to Eminents eurovoters

Apprentice Angels

The rising of the Neoeuropean Coylture

Dearest Eurovoters of both sexes ,

The “Holy Wisdom of Coincidences” (H.w.o.c.) has selected you as a recipient of the baton in the
“Euro-relay game”.

Recently the first electronic “ neo-relay game ” (the word neo means that the “baton” is in transit, or that an unlimited number of Neoathletes will be receiving it electronically) has started with the purpose of defining
the forthcoming Neoeuropean Culture .

This is a request to all conscientious and consistent Eurovoters to send to the organiser of this relay (info@teleacademy.gr) a list of the 10 – or as many as they like- that were, in their opinion, the achievements of the Classical European Culture

( aside from the Christmas Tree, the necktie, the champagne, the fork to the left, and of course the art gallery ),

so that we can recap the achievements of Classical European Culture, and to define the potential achievements of
the Neoeuropean Culture .

Well, with all good wishes, and we shall see………..

Apostolos Petridis

Independent intellectual of the visual arts

Hellenologist and amateur prophet

Questions and speculation on the invention of visual works of art

Gazing into the past towards the beginning of the creation of the world, we are able to choose among three viewpoints: the Religious, the Hegemonic, and the Scientific. Whichever position is chosen automatically leads to a study of History (ι.e. Archaeology ).

Evidently, the first ‘Lady’ of History is still in the game.
Clearly, chronologically ‘Lady Hegemony’ came first (and is able to do without ‘Lady Religion’ — who needs hierarchy). As for the various periods during which the two first ‘Ladies’ were ‘together’ either as mother and daughter or as two sisters or as wife and mother-in-law, the question is still open.

Also evident is the fact that ‘Lady Science’ is the youngest ‘Lady’ of History. But it would be unwise to overlook the possibility that some ancestor of Science invented both Hegemony and Religion.

A religious hegemony, a hegemonic religion!!!

Religious perception in Europe is almost — ‘mystically’ — ridiculous, particularly in recent centuries, the age of so-called monotheism.

In the fourth century BC, when everything was going well- they had even calculated the earth’s perimeter — a holy book was translated from Hebrew into Greek, to which no one paid any attention. And yet, three centuries later, this Book - the Old Testament - was to determine the History of two millennia and is still holding strong).

The God of the Jews was appropriated first by the Christians, later by the Muslims and — for His eternal glory — they have been fighting each other without paying the slightest attention to the gods of the rest of humanity.

The positions of the first ‘Ladies of History’ are clearly subjective, while that of Science is objective, regardless of Religion and Hegemony.

Thus all our hopes are placed in the youngest ‘Lady’ of History. But even she (always under the guardianship of the earlier ‘Ladies’) — being young - says one thing today, said something different yesterday and will speak differently again tomorrow.

Nonetheless, something will always remain for ever .

The scientific perception of the invention of visual works of art

Question 1:
What made someone (the first) create a painting or a sculpture?

- Boredom and the desire to kill time?
- Some spontaneous impulse?
- A wish to be different?

Question 2:
Who first made use of visual works of art?

- The visual artist, while also inventing religion and hegemony?
- Some powerful person commissioning the artist and using the works ‘for his own benefit’?
- Some representative of a god who commissioned the artist and used the work ‘for his own benefit’ or for the good of society?
The truth is that ‘Lady Religion’ has always been the great Patron of the Fine Arts

Question 3:
How do works of art function for art lovers or lovers of beauty?

As yet, this matter has not been sufficiently examined.
There is an interesting view regarding the function of ancient Greek statues, but it must be left for another time.

Note: The (ancient) Athenians achieved great things by ‘loving beauty modestly and philosophising without nonsense’.

Question: How do contemporary European voters love beauty?

For eminents eurovoters

Single wire sculpture

We are talking about the Hellenic perception of the male body. Therefore, our first concern is to determine from which other national perceptions we can separate the Hellenic one. Our second concern is, who will do the separation, and third, for what reason it has to be done, by anyone, in any way, and at any time.

To compare modern nations to the classical ancient Greek era, let’s look in a good dictionary and say that we found many examples, and, as a result, they were separated into three marginal categories. That is: the Greek, the Egyptian, and the Hebrew nations.

A lot of representations of ancient Egyptian bodies are preserved in two and three dimensions, and they resemble the Archaic Greek representation, in which the weight of the body in a standing position was also divided on two legs.
Representations of ancient Hebrew bodies are not preserved, so obviously they never existed, probably caused by a relevant restriction in the Heavenly Commandments.

In the past the ancients divided people into Greeks and Barbarians (not Greeks), and, questioning who should be named Greeks, they believed that probably Greeks should be the ones who participated in Greek education, i.e. irrelevant of geographical co-ordinate. In the meantime the question: Did Greece make the Greeks or the Greeks make Greece? is still unanswered, but, since we are talking about eminent eurovoters, let’s by-pass Hellenology.

The words: “distinguish”, “divide”, “elect”, and “vote”, in general are ancient Greek inventions, and they are defined by arithmetic rates. I.e. to distinguish (to elect, to vote), in a scientific expression means: 1/2 , one out of two, that is, the short from the long, and 1/3, that is the longest of the three. Simple things.

Where do the eminent eurovoters come from, and what are their three marginal categories?

In general, and without putting them in order of importance, those who are distinguished for their miraculous physical, mental, and economic abilities, are distinguished by being members of a special oligarchy or by being elected (democracy) or by being selected by fate or chance.

And who doesn’t admire and envy the eminent rich, and eminent athletes; however, we are talking about eminent scientists.

A very interesting question:
Is there any possibility of inventing a new election system?

There will always be luck, and probably democracy too, so if something happens, it will happen from the group of experts. Which could be the three marginal categories of experts? In due time, we will have to philosophize it.

Obviously, all eminent scientists, with cautiousness, agree that the male body is the "covering" which is formed around a simple hollow tub, that is, with two ends, A and B. Regarding the male body standing up, the A end is the on top, mouth and the other end is B, which is the bottom part of the body, for which we will be using the word “ folos ”, (decent word, i.e. in today’s language: eurovouter’s ass). And “folopi ”, (another new word, from “folos” and “opi”, which, by etymological rules, should be named “folosopi”; however, in European writing it is possible to cause confusion with the word “philosophy”, which sounds the same- although “ the philosophy of the folopi ” is expected to be established in the European Union, as a matter of primary importance, like “ the immortality of the soul ”, but for now it remains as it is, as "signs" show that European Union will soon replace the Latin alphabet with the Greek.

It is scientifically substantiated (experimentally), that if a solid, non- dissolvable object enters the top (mouth), it will come out from the bottom, the folopi. If it doesn’t come out the folopi, it means certainly it remains into tub.

Note 1: Very small solids and non dissolvable objects which enter the mouth could also come out from somewhere else. But that is a different matter.

Note 2: If something enters the folopi it will never come out from the mouth. (and we are not talking about magicians).

Also eurovoters’ background (there are a lot of indicative statistics), is distinctive for the bravery and beauty of their bodies, for their important contribution to Arts, Sciences, Political and Economical Progress, Religion, and Printed or Electronic Information with their own folos or someone else’s(and folopi), they do “well”, and thanks to this “well”, they do not hesitate to risk other things, as, special and standard possessions (professional, social, and family dignity), nor do they regret doing so.

We have found ourselves in the middle of a major subject, which lately obliges even the selfless lovers of Politics and Euro- politicians to meet, decide, and enact laws, relevant to the right for some eurovoters to use willingly, with mutual consent, and as they like, their folos.
(I. e .This is for some members of the European Union, which Greece isn’t among them, since, from the ancient times, the state of Greece couldn’t decide what men could do with their folos.)

We will handle the subject technocratically.

What happens with the sensors of some men’s folos?

Returning to the hollow tub, according a "neoscientific" perception of a supposed (hyppothetic) event, we mast notice that between the "macrocosmic" universe of Cosmology (with telescopes), and the "microcosmic" of Biology (with microscopes), there is a strong indicated report: the folos of every eurovoter.

Let’s by-pass the relation the folos of a possible eurovoter might have with the Cosmological Situation of the Universe, but we have to pay attention to the relation he has with the biological condition of his body. The main question is:

What kind of relation is there between the first end (mouth and lips) with the other end (folopi) of the tub of the male’s body? Are these relations analogical or nonlinear, symmetrical or asymmetrical, complementary or supplementary? Or, is there another kind of relation (digital?), unknown till now?

As to the Greek perception, the folos visualy, from the back point of view, may be square, right, and oblique. Its side view: 1) look round (the curve extends to be like an arc of a circle), 2) elliptical (the curve extends to be an ellipse arc), and 3) straight (with no curves at all).

For the research and scientific understanding of folos, the inductive method is advisable (the gathering of general conclusion from a lot, the more, the best, of real opinions). However, it is very difficult to gather real opinions, to check them, to sort them out...

So we better turn to the aphoristic method in which the three marginal categories of men (as to their sense of their folos), are:
1: KF1, those who were never bothered with it.
2: KF2, those who have the ability to find secret ways to compromise the messages of their senses, and
3: KF3, those who have the strength to be honest and satisfy the desires of their folos and (let things rip).

Attention: Do not start sending photographs and written descriptions of characteristics, or problems your folos might have. Inductive method is a special time-consuming procedure, and the founder of Teleacademy is already seventy years old.
He is well disposed, though, towards contributing to the scientific understanding of the attribute of folos (deviation), since he is self-appointed to the group of men displeased by their folos (not from natural non-functioning, or, haemorrhoids, but "logismic"-as they say software-or maybe from some inherited curse, “to miss the ship full of generous pleasures,” as a poet would say).
That is why he will prefer to use the predictable method, which is based on one "neoscientific" perception of the meaning from a supposed (hypothetic)event.

I.e. There will be given codified instructions about the three marginal categories, and every eurovoter, if he likes to, can comply, without necessarily declaring which category he belongs to, which might classify his personal data (even though this material classifying, according to a "neosocial" perception, from his birth time is stupid).

Another problem must occupy us now, for which we will need the help of eminent eurovoters. It concerns the problem of the number of each eurovoter’s ancestors, which will keep a lot of euro-intellectuals occupied, just like the “Delos problem” of ancient Greece, which also kept the intellectuals occupied then.

Every eurovoter is the result of their mommy’s and daddy’s sexual intercourse; they themselves are also the same. I.e. The family tree goes back to the beginning of Life.
How can we determine the number of ancestors? In other words, in every period of the past, there were a number of ancestors--theoretically, the same number for each period--but how is this determined?
One illustration: From every eurovoter there is an imaginary line (single, like the wire Petridis uses to make his statues), to the parents, and to the parents’ parents, which reaches the first human being, who was made by God, or, to the first cell which repeated itself over and over.

A lot of eminent eurovoters will ask, what is the use of knowing the number of the ancestors of eurovoters who lived in 1013? It’s a good question. The answer has to do with the fact that some people die without having children, and the line of life cuts off. Why? We will talk about this again.

Given that every cell contains a certain amount of information, it is surprising that there are no signs of historical terms, and especially from the pre-language epoch.
The pre-language perception of the World is a very important matter (unknown until now, or to the class of “pre-popular Galilean scientific perception”, which forces us to get involved with modern science and also with the perception of neoscience, (the meaning of a supposed event). However, texts do have a lot of hopeless problems: to read, to interpret, to understand, to do the experimental checking-and especially to develop the subject we are reading about.

Coming back to the first question: why do things happen the way they do?

First of all, if we agree with some basic definitions, we have to analyze it. I.e.”Accidental” is an event which is not “planned”. In between the accidental and the planned, there is a third case, the “symptomatic” event, which can be considered as accidental, until it’s proven (if it can be proven) that it was planned. We will talk about this again.

A large number of events that “they happen as they do” are placed among the three marginal categories:

1: Events which are known “why they happen the way do”.
2: Events unknown “why they happen the way do”, which we can’t hope to find out. and
3: Events we could find out about “why they happen, as they happen”, however…

As for the usefulness of being occupied with the solution of the problem about the number of ancestors, the theoretic problem of use is next in line.

Here is a story which might be useful to understand the problem.

Let’s say that in the year of 1013 a representative of "a voluntary society which takes care of the Greek perception of the World" (Academy P.), met a number of people (those who believe that having children is a great possession), on one big tour, and explained that a human being living in the present time has a chain of succession towards the past, and, going through the generations, he definitely arrives at the beginning of Life. It is potential, but unsure, if in the future his children will continue this chain . And for those who wished their children would be around in 2013, he renewed (GRATIS) an insurance contract and gave them a “something numbered IZ", with expiry date in the year of 2013, which goes on from generation to generation.

The present representative of the Academy P. is asking to meet those with the “something numbered IZ", in case they would like to renew (GRADIS) the contract their ancestors had made with the representative of the first Greek period of time of the Academy P., in the year which is equivalent to what we call now 13 A.D., if they wish their children to be around in the year of 3013.

With some good will, here comes up the problem of figuring out the number of ancestors one modern eurovoter has, which is addressed to eminent eurovoters.

To be continued.

Until then, one exercise for home:

Step with one foot on the scale enough to show half of your weight. And once you learn to understand when your weight is divided equally on both soles, the exercise continues until you understand when a sole has half, two thirds, or one third of the weight of your body. Good luck.

προστέθηκε στις: 10 Nov 2005